Guest post !!!!!!!!
General election 2014 result is on its brink. Psephologists present on every panel discussion in electronic news rooms and the entire hullabaloo over the social networks has not only given twists and turns to this election but it has become something more than an unpredictable package.
Some
people have rare air views; Atul Anand is one of them. It’s absolutely okay to
take a stand. You must! It is highly imperative to stick your neck out and
take a position. This friend of mine has his take on the election 2014 scenario.
Do
we really have to choose between BJP and Congress?
When I
sat to write this guest post, I paused for a moment, I tried to think of some
random topics. But I could think of nothing but politics, especially when we
are nearing the results of general election 2014. I want to admit here that I
hate those people who say “I hate politics” or “I am not interested in
politics”. There is a saying which goes somewhat similar to “You may not be
interested in politics but politics is interested in you” or “If you don’t want
to change politics, the politics will change you”. So to those people I would
like to say that please stop being ignorant and start exploring what is
happening around you.
The media
coverage of the general election 2014 was unprecedented. But let’s recall what
the issues for this election were? Was it development or corruption? Or was it
about unemployment? If Congress is corrupt then BJP or AAP is a sacred
political party? The corruption by corporations would not count as corruption? Has
Modi nothing to do with corporate loot in Gujarat? Well, these questions were
not asked by media. The discussions around the election were largely about Modi
vs Rahul Gandhi, Modi vs Sonia Gandhi, Modi vs Nitish Kumar or Modi vs Arvind
Kejriwal. The media coverage was swarmed by the personal comments made by these
politicians and Modi certainly had an upper hand there. Modi has been projected as the suitable Prime Minister
for this country for over last one year. He is definitely a much better orator
than Rahul Gandhi. But what does he talk about? Recently he has been notorious
for historical inconsistency in his speeches. I found hardly any substance in
his speeches. He loves to talk in rhetoric; the rhetoric of Gujarat development
model, the rhetoric of nationalism, etc. But does he discuss the details of
Gujarat development experience in his speeches? Because the details of Gujarat
development experience are ghastly. If this was not the case, the farmers in
Gujarat would not have been protesting against land grabbing, Gujarat would not
have Human Development Index lower than ten other states of India, Gujarat
would not have one of the worst gender ratio in the country, Gujarat would not
have one of the worst record in children with malnutrition cases. The ‘youth of
India’ (which I think largely comprises of upper class/middle class Indians)
see hope in Modi. But do they really know the Gujarat model of development? The
claims of Gujarat development model are sham. Modi has been given out lands,
natural resources and many other illegitimate favors to corporations such as
Tata, Reliance, Adani, etc. Be it cheap land and loans at as low rate as 0.1%
for Tata or gas deals with Reliance and Adani which cost huge losses to state
exchequer. Development doesn’t mean the
development of only corporations. Gujarat has very poor record when it comes to
development for all sections of society, the inclusive development. The poor of
Gujarat haven’t benefited from the so-called development of Gujarat.
It would
not be justified if we talk about Modi and we don’t mention communalism. It is
a miracle that a CM who has been questioned about his shoddy role in Gujarat
2002 riots, becomes prime ministerial candidate of his party despite of
oppositions from senior leaders. This
miracle happened with much needed support from corporations. Business knows no
religion or caste. It has no morality. Modi knew it very well. Gujarat became
heaven for corporations such as Tata, Reliance, Ambani and in return they gave
Modi all kind of gifts, from favorable media coverage (yeah, our media is owned
by these corporations) to chartered plane rides. The Muslims in Gujarat are
still discriminated. Just outside the shining city of Ahmadabad you can find
Muslims forced to live in ghettos. Hate-politics has been the favorite of BJP
and RSS; they have mastered the skill of polarizing votes by branding the
religious minorities as threat for ‘nation’. This is how Modi became ‘Hindu
Hriday Samrat’. This is how a man who had no political ground in Gujarat,
succeeded in replacing the senior leaders first at state level and then at
national level. This is how another man, who was unknown to Pilibhit
constituency, wins elections after he delivers hate-speech.
Modi
calls Rahul Gandhi a Shehzada (Prince) but why doesn’t he talk about the
princes in his own party. BJP has also got kinship. Whether it is Vasundhra
Raje or Varun Gandhi or many other sons & daughters of political elites,
they all got tickets either because of kinship or hate-politics or both. BJP is
no different from Congress in almost every aspect. Both of them have got
corporate backing. Both of them have got no problem with corruption. Leaders
from both of the parties have presided over communal riots.
After
this massive PR exercise and media advertising, if still Modi fails to become
PM, I would like him to become an actor. He is great at acting. He can make
fake claims about Gujarat development model. He can express fake concerns for
the Dalits and the Muslims. He can even organize fake encounters.
I know
for sure that this election has not been a battle between Congress and BJP, the
two so-called national parties, rather it has been a battle among Congress, BJP
and other political parties. It’s likely that BJP would not be able to get
popular majority. In that situation, we can’t deny the possibility of a third
front. After all BJP and Congress are not just the options we have got.
Atul Anand